Perimeter and asset patrols
Observe agreed boundaries and assets.
The contract must define response ownership; surveillance does not guarantee incident prevention.
Monitoring
Observe defined site areas and report agreed incidents or visible safety concerns.
Security patrols are observation missions with a defined perimeter, detection purpose and human response owner.
Site-safety review flags visible conditions for follow-up; it is not the employer’s statutory safety inspection.
Thermal hotspot observation is a sensor finding that needs the responsible site team’s escalation process.
Observe agreed boundaries and assets.
The contract must define response ownership; surveillance does not guarantee incident prevention.
Record observable hazards for the site safety team.
Visual observations support the site safety team; statutory safety inspections and employer duties remain with the responsible parties.
Support repeat observation using a specifically reviewed system.
Automation does not itself grant night or BVLOS permission.
Record suspected hotspots for responsible team review.
Detection is condition-dependent and is not fire suppression.
Read accessible rack/pallet labels for inventory reconciliation.
A distinct site-operations add-on, not security surveillance; separate indoor vendor and system-integration gate.
Operating permissions, airspace, pilot/operator responsibilities and site controls still need to be established for the actual deployment.
The named site/security response owner. The service agreement must define notification, escalation and response boundaries; observation alone is not intervention.
Visible observations support the responsible safety team and do not replace statutory inspections or employer obligations.
It is a defined in the agreed scope label-reading and inventory-reconciliation workflow with its own vendor, privacy, safety and integration checks.
Specify the observation boundary, purpose and responsible response team.
Treat automated detections as reviewable observations, not automatic enforcement.
Confirm lawful operating arrangements for any tethered, docked or repeat-flight system.
The contract must define response ownership; surveillance does not guarantee incident prevention.
Visual observations support the site safety team; statutory safety inspections and employer duties remain with the responsible parties.
Automation does not itself grant night or BVLOS permission.
Detection is condition-dependent and is not fire suppression.
A distinct site-operations add-on, not security surveillance; separate indoor vendor and system-integration gate.
Ministry of Civil Aviation / Directorate General of Civil Aviation
MeitY / Gazette of India
PIB / MoCA
Drones (MDPI) — peer-reviewed review
Your project
Security patrols & site safety
Share your project details with our team. The confirmation tells you whether email delivery was accepted.